image

School Policies & The Role Of The SENDco by Gordon Forsyth

School policies are official guidelines and procedures that a school establishes to govern its operations, ensuring consistency, fairness, and the promotion of a safe, inclusive, and productive learning environment. They provide a framework for how various situations should be handled, from behaviour and discipline to attendance, safeguarding, and inclusion.

Why Are School Policies There?

School policies serve several important purposes:

  1. Provide Structure and Clarity: They outline the expectations for students, staff, and parents, ensuring that everyone understands the rules and standards of behaviour.
  2. Ensure Consistency and Fairness: Policies ensure that decisions are made consistently across the school and that everyone is treated fairly. This avoids arbitrary decisions and promotes equity.
  3. Legal and Safeguarding Requirements: Schools are required by law to have certain policies in place, such as safeguarding, health and safety, and equality policies. These help protect the welfare of all students and staff.
  4. Promote Positive Learning Environments: By setting out clear rules and guidelines, policies help create an environment that supports learning and respects the rights of all individuals.
  5. Guide Staff and Leadership Decisions: School staff, including teachers and administrators, rely on policies to guide their responses to various situations, such as behaviour management, addressing bullying, or providing special educational support.

Can School Policies Be Flexible for Individuals with Additional Needs or Disabilities?

Yes, school policies can—and often should—be flexible to accommodate the needs of students with additional needs or disabilities. This is not just a matter of good practice; it is also a legal requirement under various pieces of legislation, such as the Equality Act 2010 in the UK. This law requires schools to make “reasonable adjustments” to ensure that disabled students are not disadvantaged.

Here’s how flexibility might work:

  1. Reasonable Adjustments: Schools are legally obligated to make reasonable adjustments to their policies, practices, and environment to ensure students with disabilities can access the same education and opportunities as their peers. This might include:
    • Behaviour Policies: Flexibility in discipline for students whose behaviour is a result of a disability, such as autism or ADHD. For example, if a student has sensory processing issues, a different approach to behaviour management may be required.
    • Homework Policies: Students with specific learning difficulties may be given extended deadlines or alternative tasks to account for their challenges with certain assignments.
    • Attendance Policies: For students with medical needs or conditions like anxiety, schools may have more flexible approaches to attendance requirements.
  2. Personalised Learning and Support Plans: For students with special educational needs (SEN) or an Education, Health, and Care (EHC) plan, the school is expected to tailor its approach. This might involve providing additional learning support, assistive technology, or therapy sessions that are not part of the usual policy for other students.
  3. Inclusion and Access to Activities: Schools should also ensure that students with additional needs are able to participate fully in school life, including extracurricular activities and trips. Policies around participation may need to be adjusted to provide support, such as having additional staff on trips or ensuring physical accessibility.
  4. Flexibility in Curriculum Delivery: For some students, rigid curriculum policies may need to be adapted. For example, a student with dyslexia may need different forms of assessment (e.g., oral rather than written exams) to demonstrate their knowledge.

Balancing Flexibility with Fairness

While policies can be flexible, it’s important to ensure that this flexibility does not undermine fairness for all students. Schools often aim to strike a balance between being accommodating to individual needs and maintaining a sense of fairness and equity across the student body.

Key Points to Remember:

  • Flexibility is Necessary: Schools are required by law to make reasonable adjustments to policies to avoid disadvantaging students with disabilities or additional needs.
  • Legislation: In many countries, including the UK (under the Equality Act 2010), schools must avoid discrimination and provide equal access to education through reasonable adjustments.
  • Individualised Support: Students with SEN or an EHC plan are entitled to personalised adjustments that might include flexible interpretations of standard policies.

In short, school policies are important for maintaining order and clarity, but they are not set in stone, especially when it comes to ensuring that students with additional needs or disabilities are supported appropriately.

1. A bullying policy in schools is a key document that outlines the school’s approach to preventing, identifying, and addressing bullying among students. It is designed to ensure that students feel safe and supported in their learning environment. While the specifics of a bullying policy can vary between schools, most policies include several core elements. Here’s what is typically included:

  1. Definition of Bullying

The policy typically begins by defining what constitutes bullying. This includes:

  • Physical Bullying: Hitting, kicking, pushing, or any form of physical aggression.
  • Verbal Bullying: Name-calling, insults, threats, or other forms of spoken harassment.
  • Emotional or Psychological Bullying: Spreading rumours, excluding someone, or deliberate actions to hurt someone’s feelings or self-esteem.
  • Cyberbullying: Bullying that takes place online through social media, texts, emails, or other digital platforms.
  • Relational Bullying: Social exclusion, manipulation of friendships, and other behaviours aimed at damaging a person’s social relationships.
  1. Aims and Objectives
  • To provide a safe and secure learning environment for all students.
  • To ensure that bullying is understood as unacceptable behaviour that will not be tolerated.
  • To outline the school’s commitment to preventing and addressing bullying.
  1. Signs of Bullying

The policy may list common signs that a child is being bullied, including:

  • Changes in behaviour, such as becoming withdrawn or anxious.
  • Unexplained injuries or damage to personal belongings.
  • Avoiding school or a drop in academic performance.
  • Changes in eating or sleeping habits.
  1. Roles and Responsibilities

This section outlines the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in the school community, including:

  • Staff: Teachers and staff members are responsible for identifying, reporting, and responding to incidents of bullying. They are also responsible for fostering a positive, inclusive environment that discourages bullying.
  • Students: Students are encouraged to report bullying, whether they experience it themselves or witness it happening to others. They are expected to respect others and not engage in bullying.
  • Parents/Guardians: Parents are encouraged to communicate any concerns to the school if they suspect their child is being bullied or involved in bullying. They should work in partnership with the school to support their child.
  • Governing Body: The school’s governing body ensures that the policy is implemented effectively and regularly reviewed.
  1. Preventative Measures
  • Curriculum Integration: Schools may implement lessons on respect, empathy, and diversity in subjects such as Personal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) education or citizenship.
  • Assemblies and Awareness Campaigns: Regular assemblies or anti-bullying campaigns are used to promote understanding of bullying and its consequences.
  • Creating a Positive School Culture: Encouraging positive behavior, peer support programs, and a culture of inclusivity.
  • Staff Training: Teachers and staff are trained to identify signs of bullying and respond effectively.
  1. Reporting and Investigating Bullying
  • How to Report: The policy should provide clear guidance on how students, parents, or staff can report bullying incidents. This often includes:
    • Speaking to a teacher, tutor, or school counsellor.
    • Using an anonymous reporting system if available.
  • Investigation Process: The policy outlines how reports of bullying will be investigated. This may involve:
    • Interviewing the students involved.
    • Gathering evidence, such as witness statements or reviewing social media messages in cases of cyberbullying.
    • Ensuring confidentiality and sensitivity throughout the process.
  1. Responding to Bullying Incidents

The policy explains the steps the school will take if bullying is confirmed, which may include:

  • Restorative Approaches: Encouraging the perpetrator to understand the impact of their behaviour and take responsibility for it.
  • Disciplinary Measures: Depending on the severity, sanctions might include detentions, exclusion from certain activities, or, in severe cases, suspension or expulsion.
  • Support for the Victim: This can include counselling, a buddy system, or ongoing monitoring by staff to ensure their well-being.
  • Support for the Bully: If appropriate, the bully may be offered support, such as counselling, to address the underlying reasons for their behaviour and help them change it.
  1. Follow-up and Monitoring
  • Ensuring that both the victim and the bully are monitored after an incident to prevent further issues and ensure the well-being of all students involved.
  • Follow-up meetings with students and parents may be arranged to check that the bullying has stopped and that the victim feels safe and supported.
  1. Recording and Reporting
  • Documenting Incidents: The school will keep a record of all bullying incidents, which is important for tracking patterns and ensuring accountability.
  • Reporting to the Governing Body: The policy may outline how frequently bullying incidents are reported to the governing body and, in some cases, to local authorities.
  1. Support for Affected Students

The policy often includes provisions for offering support to both victims and perpetrators of bullying, such as:

  • Counselling Services: Offering access to school counsellors or external support services.
  • Peer Support Programs: Establishing buddy systems or peer mentoring to support victims.
  1. Policy Review
  • The policy should specify how often it will be reviewed to ensure it remains up-to-date with best practices and current legislation. This typically involves reviewing the policy annually or bi-annually.
  1. Links to Other Policies

Bullying policies often link to other relevant school policies, such as:

  • Behaviour Policy: How bullying fits into the school’s overall behaviour management system.
  • Safeguarding Policy: Bullying as a potential safeguarding issue.
  • Equalities Policy: Ensuring bullying policies promote equality and protect against discrimination based on race, gender, disability, etc.

Summary of Key Elements:

  • Definition of bullying (including physical, verbal, emotional, and cyberbullying).
  • Roles and responsibilities for staff, students, and parents.
  • Preventative measures to reduce the risk of bullying.
  • Clear procedures for reporting and investigating bullying.
  • Disciplinary actions and support strategies for both the victim and the bully.
  • Ongoing monitoring and follow-up after incidents are resolved.

This framework ensures that schools handle bullying in a structured, fair, and legally compliant

 

Why Schools Hold Re-integration Meetings

  1. Ensure Support for the Student: The meeting helps address the underlying reasons for the exclusion and ensures that appropriate support is in place for the student to succeed upon returning.
  2. Set Expectations: It provides an opportunity to reaffirm school rules and expectations with the student and their family.
  3. Repair Relationships: Schools use this time to repair relationships between the student, staff, and other pupils where necessary.
  4. Plan Adjustments: If needed, the school can adjust the student’s support plan, timetable, or interventions to prevent future incidents.
  5. Legal Requirement: While not strictly mandated, holding a re-integration meeting aligns with statutory guidance for managing behaviour in schools to promote inclusion and minimise future exclusions.

Alternatives Schools Could Consider

While re-integration meetings are common, schools might adapt or replace them with other approaches:

  1. Restorative Practices: Instead of a formal meeting, schools could use restorative approaches to focus on dialogue, accountability, and repairing harm caused by the behaviour.
  2. Pre-Return Check-ins: A more informal check-in with a pastoral lead, counsellor, or trusted staff member can help assess readiness and reduce anxiety for the student.
  3. Home Visits: In some cases, visiting the student at home may be less intimidating and provide insights into potential external factors contributing to the behaviour.
  4. Collaborative Planning: Involve external professionals (e.g., educational psychologists or behaviour specialists) in creating a tailored plan that addresses the root causes of the behaviour.
  5. Gradual Re-integration: For students with additional needs or anxiety, a phased return to school may be more effective, starting with shorter days or specific lessons.
  6. Parent Workshops: Instead of a single meeting, provide ongoing workshops or discussions with parents to improve understanding and engagement in supporting their child.

If exclusions and re-integration meetings are a frequent issue, schools might also benefit from reviewing their policies to focus on early interventions, additional staff training, or systemic support for vulnerable students, especially those with special educational needs or autism.

 

The role of the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Coordinator (SENDCo) in mainstream schools is pivotal in ensuring that the school provides appropriate support for pupils with additional needs. Here’s an outline of their responsibilities and influence:

Role of the SENDCo in Mainstream Schools

  1. Strategic Leadership:
    • SENDCos lead the school’s SEND strategy, ensuring compliance with the SEND Code of Practice (2015).
    • They work closely with the headteacher, senior leadership team (SLT), and governing body to embed inclusive practices across the school.
  2. Identification and Assessment:
    • SENDCos identify pupils who may have special educational needs and coordinate assessments to understand their specific needs.
    • They liaise with external professionals, such as educational psychologists, speech and language therapists, and other specialists.
  3. Coordination of Support:
    • They ensure that appropriate interventions, support plans, and reasonable adjustments are in place.
    • SENDCos monitor the effectiveness of support and update it as necessary, based on the pupil’s progress.
  4. Staff Training and Development:
    • SENDCos provide or organise training for teachers and support staff to help them meet the needs of SEND pupils.
    • They ensure all staff understand their responsibilities under the Equality Act 2010 and the SEND Code of Practice.
  5. Parental Engagement:
    • SENDCos are often the main point of contact for parents of SEND pupils, ensuring their concerns are addressed and that they are involved in planning and decision-making.
  6. Documentation:
    • SENDCos oversee the development and review of Education, Health, and Care Plans (EHCPs), Individual Education Plans (IEPs), and support plans.
    • They keep records to demonstrate the school’s compliance with legal obligations.

Influence on School Policies

SENDCos play a significant role in ensuring school policies reflect the needs of SEND pupils, although they are not solely responsible for creating or adjusting policies. Their responsibilities include:

  1. Advocating for Adjustments:
    • SENDCos advise senior leaders on adjustments required to ensure policies do not disadvantage SEND pupils (e.g., behaviour, homework, or accessibility policies).
    • They ensure policies align with the Equality Act 2010, which mandates reasonable adjustments to prevent discrimination.
  2. Policy Implementation:
    • While SENDCos may not directly write policies, they ensure that SEND considerations are embedded in their implementation.
    • They collaborate with other leaders to ensure the policies are inclusive and support staff to apply them effectively.
  3. Policy Review:
    • SENDCos contribute to the review of policies, using data and feedback from pupils, parents, and staff to recommend changes.
    • They highlight areas where policies may unintentionally exclude or disadvantage SEND pupils and advocate for improvements.
  4. Collaboration with Leadership:
    • Adjustments often require agreement from the SLT or governing body. SENDCos must communicate the rationale for adjustments clearly and advocate for resource allocation where necessary.

Best Practice for SENDCos

  • Whole-School Approach: SENDCos need support from the entire school community, as they cannot implement change in isolation.
  • Building Relationships: Maintaining strong communication with staff, families, and external professionals is crucial for advocating adjustments.
  • Ongoing CPD: Continuous professional development ensures SENDCos are up to date with legislation, research, and best practices.
  • Data-Driven Advocacy: Using evidence to highlight the impact of current policies or proposed changes strengthens their case.

Conclusion

While SENDCos play a central role in identifying the need for and advocating adjustments to policies, they operate within a framework of shared responsibility. Senior leaders and governing bodies must work collaboratively with the SENDCo to ensure that policies are flexible, inclusive, and effectively implemented for SEND pupils.

 

The information provided is accurate and reflects the statutory and typical practices for SENDCos in mainstream schools in England. It is based on the Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice (2015) and the Equality Act 2010, which govern SEND provision in schools. Here’s a closer look at its accuracy:

Key References for Accuracy

  1. SEND Code of Practice (2015):
    • This statutory guidance outlines the responsibilities of SENDCos, including identifying needs, coordinating provision, and working with parents and external professionals.
    • It also emphasizes the importance of SENDCos working strategically with senior leaders to ensure that SEND pupils are supported effectively.
    • SENDCos must be qualified teachers and either already hold or be working towards the National Award for SEN Coordination if newly appointed.
  2. Equality Act 2010:
    • This law underpins the responsibility of schools to make reasonable adjustments for pupils with SEND to ensure they are not disadvantaged. The SENDCo’s role often includes ensuring compliance with this act.
  3. Every Child Matters Framework (2003) and subsequent educational policies:
    • These advocate for a holistic approach to supporting children, which is part of the SENDCo’s remit.

Points of Confirmation

  • Strategic Role: SENDCos are indeed central to shaping inclusive practices in schools. They collaborate with SLT but do not work in isolation. This aligns with the expectation for schools to adopt a “whole-school” approach to SEND.
  • Policy Influence: While SENDCos do not unilaterally change policies, their input is crucial to ensure compliance with statutory requirements and best practices.
  • Coordination of Support: The description of managing EHCPs, IEPs, and liaising with professionals accurately reflects their responsibilities.
  • Training and Collaboration: Providing staff training and fostering collaboration with families and external professionals is a statutory and practical element of the role.

Caveats and Variations

While the description is accurate, the role’s implementation can vary between schools:

  • School Size and Resources: In smaller schools, SENDCos may also have teaching responsibilities, which could limit their capacity to lead strategically.
  • School Culture: In some schools, the SENDCo may have less influence on policy due to leadership dynamics.
  • Local Authority (LA) Variations: Different LAs provide varying levels of support and expectations for SEND provision.

Summary

This overview is accurate, grounded in legal and policy frameworks, and reflective of best practices. However, the effectiveness of the SENDCo role depends on how well the school supports the SENDCo through adequate time, training, and resources. If you’re using this information for a specific purpose, such as training or policy development, referencing the SEND Code of Practice and Equality Act will strengthen its validity.

 The concept of reasonable adjustments is a legal obligation under the Equality Act 2010, aimed at ensuring that children with disabilities (including many with SEND) are not put at a substantial disadvantage compared to their peers. Understanding what constitutes a reasonable adjustment and how it applies in schools is essential for ensuring inclusivity and fairness.

  1. Reasonable Adjustments DefinedReasonable adjustments are changes or accommodations schools must make to:
    • Remove or reduce barriers that might disadvantage a child with SEND.
    • Ensure the child can access learning and participate in school life as fully as possible.

    The adjustments should be proactive and tailored to the child’s individual needs, ensuring compliance with both the Equality Act and the SEND Code of Practice.

    Key Considerations for Reasonable Adjustments

    Schools should consider the following when deciding what is “reasonable”:

    1. Effectiveness:
      • Does the adjustment help the child overcome the disadvantage they are experiencing?
      • For example, providing a quiet sensory break area can help a child with autism manage sensory overload.
    2. Practicality:
      • Can the adjustment be implemented without causing significant disruption to the school or other pupils?
      • For example, moving a class to a ground-floor room for a child with mobility issues is typically practical.
    3. Cost:
      • The cost of the adjustment should be reasonable within the school’s budget. Schools can seek additional funding through the Local Authority (e.g., through the notional SEND budget or EHCP funding) if costs are higher.
    4. Impact on Others:
      • Adjustments should balance the child’s needs with the needs of other pupils and staff.
    5. Individual Needs:
      • Adjustments must be specific to the child’s condition, not generic approaches. For instance, a child with dyslexia might require access to reading software, while a child with ADHD might benefit from regular movement breaks.

    Examples of Reasonable Adjustments

    Here are common adjustments schools should consider:

    1. Environmental Adjustments:
      • Providing a quiet or low-stimulation workspace for children with sensory processing difficulties or autism.
      • Installing wheelchair ramps or accessible toilets for children with physical disabilities.
    2. Curricular Adjustments:
      • Offering differentiated tasks or alternative ways to demonstrate learning (e.g., oral presentations instead of written work for a child with dyslexia).
      • Allowing additional time for tasks and assessments.
    3. Supportive Resources:
      • Providing assistive technology, such as text-to-speech software for children with reading difficulties.
      • Offering large-print or Braille resources for children with visual impairments.
    4. Policy Adjustments:
      • Modifying behaviour policies to consider underlying SEND needs (e.g., recognising that a meltdown might be a result of anxiety, not deliberate defiance).
      • Adjusting uniform policies for sensory-sensitive children (e.g., allowing softer fabrics or different styles).
    5. Flexibility:
      • Allowing part-time attendance or staggered start times for children with health issues or anxiety.
      • Offering additional breaks or free movement for children with ADHD.
    6. Communication Support:
      • Using visual timetables or social stories for children who struggle with transitions or understanding routines.
      • Providing interpreters or communication aids for children with hearing impairments.

    Why These Adjustments Are Considered Reasonable

    1. Legality:
      • The Equality Act 2010 requires schools to anticipate the needs of SEND pupils and prevent discrimination.
      • Failure to make reasonable adjustments can be deemed unlawful.
    2. Fairness and Equity:
      • Adjustments level the playing field, ensuring all children have equal access to education.
    3. Impact on Outcomes:
      • When adjustments are effective, they enable SEND children to achieve their potential and participate fully in school life.
    4. Inclusive Environment:
      • Implementing reasonable adjustments fosters an inclusive school culture, benefiting all pupils and promoting understanding.

    Unreasonable Adjustments

    Schools are not required to make adjustments that:

    • Compromise the safety or education of other students.
    • Incur a disproportionate cost that cannot be met within available funding.
    • Fundamentally change the nature of the school or curriculum.

    Conclusion

    Reasonable adjustments are about removing barriers and ensuring SEND pupils can thrive in their educational environment. Schools must take a thoughtful, case-by-case approach, balancing practicality with the needs and rights of the child. By working closely with parents, pupils, and external professionals, schools can ensure adjustments are effective, proportionate, and inclusive.

     

    When discussing reasonable adjustments in the context of the Equality Act 2010, the phrase “compromise the safety or education of other students” refers to situations where an adjustment made for a pupil with SEND could negatively affect the well-being, learning, or rights of other pupils. This consideration ensures that adjustments for one individual do not create significant risks or disadvantages for others in the school community.

    What It Means in Practice

    1. Compromising Safety:
      • Adjustments should not create a physical or emotional safety risk for other students or staff.
      • Examples:
        • A child displaying physically aggressive behaviour due to their SEND might require specific interventions. While the school must support the child, adjustments that result in repeated harm to peers or staff (e.g., without effective risk management plans) could be considered unreasonable.
        • Allowing a child with SEND to bypass safety rules (e.g., not wearing protective equipment in a science lab) could endanger themselves or others.
    2. Compromising Education:
      • Adjustments should not excessively disrupt the learning environment or unfairly impede the education of other students.
      • Examples:
        • If a child frequently has loud meltdowns in class and no measures (e.g., alternative spaces or de-escalation plans) are in place to manage this, it could disrupt the learning of their peers.
        • A decision to focus all staff resources on supporting one child with SEND during lessons might limit support available to other pupils, affecting their education.

    Balancing Rights and Responsibilities

    The school must find a balance between:

    • Meeting the individual needs of the child with SEND through reasonable adjustments.
    • Maintaining a safe and productive environment for all students and staff.

    Schools are legally required to:

    • Explore all possible solutions before deciding an adjustment is unreasonable.
    • Work proactively to minimise risks, such as using risk assessments, behaviour plans, and external support.

    Strategies to Avoid Compromises

    Schools should employ these strategies to ensure adjustments are effective and equitable:

    1. Risk Assessments:
      • Identify potential risks and plan interventions to mitigate them (e.g., 1:1 support or a safe space for de-escalation).
    2. Alternative Arrangements:
      • Provide adjustments in ways that do not affect others (e.g., use a separate workspace or adapt group dynamics).
    3. Staff Training:
      • Train staff to handle challenging situations so adjustments are implemented smoothly without causing undue disruption.
    4. External Support:
      • Involve specialists, such as educational psychologists or behaviour consultants, to develop strategies that work for everyone.

    When It Becomes Unreasonable

    An adjustment may be deemed unreasonable if:

    • Despite the school’s best efforts, the adjustment results in repeated harm to others.
    • The adjustment disrupts the overall learning environment to such an extent that the quality of education for other pupils significantly declines.
    • The school lacks the resources, expertise, or facilities to implement the adjustment effectively, even after seeking external support.

    Key Consideration: Finding a Middle Ground

    It’s essential for schools to work collaboratively with parents, the child, and external professionals to find solutions that:

    • Meet the child’s needs as far as possible.
    • Minimise the impact on the safety and education of others.

    The focus should always be on inclusion, creativity, and flexibility in finding adjustments that work for everyone involved.

School Policies & The Role Of The SENDco by Gordon Forsyth